Sap registered server program transaction

Kindly help ASAP. Rgds, Seema. Reagan Benjamin Posted October 4, 0 Comments. Hello, You need to make sure that the program mentioned in the RFC should be running on the target system. Regards, RB. David Caddick Posted October 5, 0 Comments. Anonymous Posted October 5, 0 Comments. Anonymous Posted October 8, 0 Comments.

Hi, Connection is working fine now. Another problem arises. David Caddick Posted October 8, 0 Comments. Register or Login. Welcome back! Sign in with Email. Reset Your Password We'll send an email with a link to reset your password. Program1 is the name given in SM59 ProgramId. If you do the following: rfcexec -aProgram1 -gy52tdc00 -xsapgw52 This means that you are trying to register the sample program "rfcexec" with ID "Program1" on the gateway. If you are not trying to connect to program rfcexec, the developer of the program you are trying to run should be contacted to advise how to correctly register their program.

In some cases, a particular service may need to be started. You should know the name of the program you are trying to register. There is no direct possibility to find out the name of the backend program which is associated with the Program ID used for a registered connection in SM The only possibility is to do a level 3 trace of the gateway to get the IP and remote number of the program that registers.

With this information you need to remotely execute a netstat and search for the pid of the program that is running on that port. Now we have a proposal for a generic middleware layer, all Microsoft based, taking in the HTTP call from the mobile device, in whatever country, working out dynamically the correct source system and connecting to it. All lovely and object oriented, several layers all abstracted from each other.

The problem is the architecture calls for assorted Microsoft integration services connecting to the source systems. Now I don;t want to give up Gateway. Now, I would like to tell me that these arguments are nonsense, and give me some cast iron reasons I can use to knock holes in the proposed plans. However if the above are valid arguments, please tell me that as well. I try to keep an open mind, and I have a lot of respect for the architect of the middle ware framework and how well designed it is from an abstract OO perspective.

It is just this one little technical part of the pie I am concerned with. I need something more concrete. If you mean something different then maybe my questions become nonsense! Sorry about that. It only occurred to me right at the end of writing my question that SAP like to have five or six totally disparate components, all doing utterly different things, all with the exact same name.

It is like Heathrow airport in the UK where there are two hotels nearby, both in the same street, both having the exact same name, and they cannot for the life of them work out why they keep getting each others mail, or having each others guests turn up.

I know you do not decide what names components are called, so I am not having a go at you, but you have to admit it is rather silly to call lots of different things the same name and then not expect people to get confused.

As Einstein once said "there are only two things that are infinite - the universe, and human stupidity. And I am not sure about the universe". We have multiple application servers on SAP. The only issue is that if the server mentioned in the Gateway Host goes down for reasons like Rolling kernel Switch etc,The external application wil not be able to connect.

Yes, on section " Getting Program and Gateway details on SM59" if you see exactly this example on item 4 picture, there is no Gateway defined on "Gateway Options". When this information is blank, this destination can use any Gateway from system to communicate with the program. So, even if one instance is down, the rest of the instances will keep online and having the TP program registered. Such system could provide a way to register the program on a list of instances, but this is not mandatory.

If we are talking about a third-party non-SAP system, then you should contact the support team of the system. If it is an SAP system, you can search for documentation help. This is exactly the purpose of this blog. As documented on SAP note The RFC connection tests were successful only while rfcexec process was running. Otherwise, the RFC tests fail with error "program not registered" If the rfcexec is only for testing purposes, then I'm a bit confused.

What does "program registration" actually mean? In this testing scenario rfcexec has role of RFC server. It is registered at particular gateway, it technically means that network socket connection was created between RFC server actively running rfcexec and the gateway.